🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor is likely the optimal selection for a audacious scary movie about the biblical figure, though not for the motivations some audiences may think. In reality, Cage doesn't actually portray Jesus in The Carpenter’s Son: his character is listed simply as a craftsman. The actor is positioned as a father figure in this story, striving to keep his faith while the teenage character (portrayed by the young actor), his teenage foster child, commences to display divine powers. The reason it’s difficult to envision a different major actor in this role is that although the role is stricken with various difficulties, Cage himself appears almost emotionally confident that the dark, somber feature is worth his time.

The Actor's Current Film Selections

Nicolas Cage has been using his time more selectively in recent years. He continues to stars in additional projects than most regular audiences will ever see — for instance, were you informed that he has filmed several separate cowboy movies in the past three years? — yet he also mixes in prestige A24/Neon gigs like Dream Scenario, Pig, and a further title. This new film seems like one of those, in that it’s not strictly scary, likely to stir debate, and approaches a campy-sounding premise quite seriously.

Movie's Premise and Handling

Regrettably, filmmaker Lotfy Nathan fails to repay viewer engagement. The film opens in a interestingly wandering setting, presented as inspired by an obscure religious text about the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, the maternal figure, and their child travel constantly, afraid of doctrinal intolerance or distrust about their son's unusual abilities. “Calamity follows us,” The Carpenter sadly observes. It goes on as sinister entities target the household in their latest settlement, initiating on the well-known scriptural test for the youth.

Sometimes, the movie resembles an demonic possession-type horror film, though none of the central roles are directly possessed. Instead, they become more and more distant from one another, as these forces infect a nearby girl (the actress, credited as an outsider) who The Boy bonds with, and provides all unsettling premonitions of a bleak destiny. Cage's role in particular struggles with his position in the narrative, sometimes scolding the boy he can’t fully understand.

Discussion and Care

The content is prone to invite debate, and Nathan handles it with a lot of sensitivity — excessive, perhaps. The idea of a young man confronted with his destined offering and tempted by dark influences is truly frightening, but the filmmaker might be wary of looking exploitative and anxious to telegraph his goals, so he often falls back on dimly foreboding cinematography. Characters constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who showed notable talent in a recent film update, surprisingly — surrenders her performance to her Mother Mary cloak, at times punctuated by several disturbing frightening scenes.

Cage's Portrayal and Movie's Shortcomings

Simultaneously, Cage flirts with precisely the type of melodramatic acting that those who enjoy his campier roles could be expecting. There is a moment (also included) in the trailer where Cage erupts and shouts “My faith has been shattered!” If that kind of dramatic explosion is part of a biblical thriller, perhaps a more openly absurd approach would take better advantage of his eagerness to go over the top as required. Instead, the film echoes the less successful straight-to-DVD films Cage made through much of the last decade — excluding the campy action films but rather the narrative films and supernatural thrillers that typically appear interesting, and frequently include a few choice Cage moments, but finally come across like, frankly, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Frankly, several of these, though not as grand, were easier to view as a whole. Here is where I must violate my own dogma, not spiritual but professional: Long ago, an admired senior convinced me to eliminate words like “boring” or “dull” from my reviewing language. These phrases communicate minimal except a individual and generically described lack of patience, avoiding the duty of vividly conveying the mental and sensation of watching a particular movie. It's challenging to express tedium without appearing dull yourself. It's equally vague as calling a movie “notable.” “Say more,” that is.

However, I admit, I felt uninterested for a large part of The Carpenter’s Son. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it’s a religious style of stultification, not due to this movie is preachy, but because it requires a sort of patient acceptance to view it. At some point early on, the film settles into a monotonous pattern of ongoing suffering, and fails to