🔗 Share this article

Long-standing racism is returning to British the political arena, which creates deeply uneasy, the Prime Minister has stated, alerting that divisive hard-right political tactics was “tearing our country apart”.

Tackling Discriminatory Language and Divisive Strategies

Speaking to doctor and media figure a well-known TV doctor, the prime minister accused the Reform UK party of overseeing the revival to racist and divisive politics which many believed was resolved years back”.

During the discussion, broadcast on ITV’s Lorraine show on Tuesday, the PM provided his strongest signal that the limit on child benefits might be scrapped during the upcoming fiscal announcement later this month.

Commitment to Combat Poverty Among Children

Asked if he planned to eliminate this restriction, which charities have said is the biggest driver of child poverty across Britain, Starmer said: “I can tell you in no uncertain terms I am committed to drive child poverty down.”

He listed measures the government has already launched such as no-cost school lunches, breakfast clubs, and child care support but added: “We must go beyond these efforts, and I assure you and tell you I will personally focus to cutting childhood poverty.”

Pressed on whether his remarks indicated he intended to remove the two-child cap, he stated “I would not say we aim to lower poverty among children if I wasn’t clear that we will be taking a number of measures to achieve this”.

Clear Signals from Rachel Reeves

Rachel Reeves, gave a similarly clear signal earlier this week when she told BBC Radio 5 Live that finally, no child should suffer if their parents are struggling financially”.

Government officials are reportedly planning to lift the limit entirely, having originally looked at phasing it out for bigger households or wealthier families. An economic thinktank has estimated the expense would be about £3.5bn by the end of the decade.

Political Divide and National Renewal

During the discussion, Starmer explained the political divide currently in Britain was between Labour’s “patriotic national renewal” versus Reform’s harmful divisiveness and other right-wing groups that are “tearing our country apart”.

“Parts of the discourse we’re hearing – discriminatory talk, divisive rhetoric – that frankly I thought had been addressed long ago has reemerged in political debate leaving people fearful,” he said.

“We must confront to that racism, that divisiveness, and affirm with pride that to be British is to have concern for others, requires rationality, is to be tolerant and compassionate, and this is our pride.”

Reflecting Warnings from Wes Streeting

Starmer mirrored sentiments expressed by the Health Secretary, who warned recently that a disturbing form of discrimination similar to past decades had become alarmingly frequent again and that NHS staff were bearing the brunt of it.

The health secretary said occurrences of both verbal and physical attacks targeting individuals due to race now happened so often making it “acceptable to express racism”.

“It is time to put a stop to discrimination across the UK and we need to place such harmful attitudes that’s found expression in our country back in its box and reestablish a climate in this country where it is not socially acceptable to be racist,” the Health Secretary said.

Critical Decision for Voters

Starmer spoke at the Labour party conference this autumn to outline clear divisions between himself and Farage, saying that the public faced a crucial decision.

He explained he was engaged in a “fight for the soul of our country”, and argued that while voters had “reasonable” concerns about illegal migration, there was “a moral line” that Farage and others had crossed.

The PM pledged to challenge anyone who argued that non-white individuals did not belong and that households who had lived in the UK for generations must be removed, stating those advocating these ideas constituted “an enemy of national renewal”.

“If you incite racist violence and hatred, that is not expressing concern: it’s criminal. Our political movement values national symbols, but if they are displayed alongside graffiti, telling a Chinese takeaway owner to ‘go home’, that is not patriotism; that is pure discrimination,” he informed activists.